Review




Structured Review

ActiGraph llc accelerometer actiheart x-axis
A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using <t>Actiheart</t> and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.
Accelerometer Actiheart X Axis, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/actiheart+x-axis/pmc04010568-314-99-102?v=ActiGraph+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
accelerometer actiheart x-axis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers"

Article Title: Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209

A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.
Figure Legend Snippet: A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.

Techniques Used:

Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).
Figure Legend Snippet: Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation



Similar Products

90
ActiGraph llc accelerometer actiheart x-axis
A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using <t>Actiheart</t> and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.
Accelerometer Actiheart X Axis, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/actiheart+x-axis/pmc04010568-314-99-102?v=ActiGraph+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
accelerometer actiheart x-axis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ActiGraph llc actiheart x-axis
A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using <t>Actiheart</t> and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.
Actiheart X Axis, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/actiheart+x-axis/pmc04010568-309-19-26?v=ActiGraph+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
actiheart x-axis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ActiGraph llc actiheart x-axis (cpm)
A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using <t>Actiheart</t> and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.
Actiheart X Axis (Cpm), supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/actiheart+x-axis/10__1249_slash_mss__0000000000000209-259-5-12?v=ActiGraph+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
actiheart x-axis (cpm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise

Article Title: Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.

Article Snippet: Different combinations of cut-points based on the smoothing splines and ROC results were tried and the majority vote was used to determine the best classifier (i.e., the cut-point combination that provided the highest correct classification rate from the confusion matrix). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Techniques:

Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise

Article Title: Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209

Figure Lengend Snippet: Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Article Snippet: Different combinations of cut-points based on the smoothing splines and ROC results were tried and the majority vote was used to determine the best classifier (i.e., the cut-point combination that provided the highest correct classification rate from the confusion matrix). fig ft0 fig mode=article f1 fig/graphic|fig/alternatives/graphic mode="anchored" m1 Open in a separate window caption a7 Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation

A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise

Article Title: Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Bland-Altman plots evaluating the prediction of energy expenditure by cross-sectional time series models (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models using Actiheart and ActiGraph devices versus energy expenditure measured by room respiration calorimetry (n=50). The mean difference between measured EE and predicted EE is plotted against the mean of the two methods; the mean bias is shown by a solid line and the 95% limits of agreement are shown by dash lines.

Article Snippet: Applying the AEE thresholds, the following initial accelerometer cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 36, 449, 1,297 cpm for Actiheart x-axis; 610, 3,908, 6,112 cpm for ActiGraph vector magnitude; and 110, 2,120, 4,450 cpm for ActiGraph x-axis.

Techniques:

Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Journal: Medicine and science in sports and exercise

Article Title: Prediction of Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity in Preschoolers

doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209

Figure Lengend Snippet: Smoothing splines curve fitting used to define activity energy expenditure (AEE) levels for sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity in preschool-aged children from heart rate thresholds (A); smoothing splines curve fitting applied to the AEE and accelerometer counts to identify accelerometer cut-points for Actiheart x-axis (B), ActiGraph vector magnitude (C), and ActiGraph x-axis (D).

Article Snippet: Applying the AEE thresholds, the following initial accelerometer cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 36, 449, 1,297 cpm for Actiheart x-axis; 610, 3,908, 6,112 cpm for ActiGraph vector magnitude; and 110, 2,120, 4,450 cpm for ActiGraph x-axis.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation